On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 10:47 AM Pedro Tammela <pctamm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Andrii suggested to remove this abstraction layer and have the percpu
> handling more explicit[1].
>
> This patch also updates the tests that relied on the macros.
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/caef4bzymj_zpdq8zi4dbntbojkrpu2tvopysbnrdd9fohtf...@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <and...@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pedro Tammela <pctamm...@mojatatu.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h | 7 --
> .../bpf/map_tests/htab_map_batch_ops.c | 87 +++++++++----------
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_init.c | 9 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 84 +++++++++++-------
> 4 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h
> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h
> index a3352a64c067..105db3120ab4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h
> @@ -20,13 +20,6 @@ static inline unsigned int bpf_num_possible_cpus(void)
> return possible_cpus;
> }
>
> -#define __bpf_percpu_val_align __attribute__((__aligned__(8)))
> -
> -#define BPF_DECLARE_PERCPU(type, name) \
> - struct { type v; /* padding */ } __bpf_percpu_val_align \
> - name[bpf_num_possible_cpus()]
> -#define bpf_percpu(name, cpu) name[(cpu)].v
> -
Hmm. I wonder what Daniel has to say about it, since he
introduced it in commit f3515b5d0b71 ("bpf: provide a generic macro
for percpu values for selftests")
to address a class of bugs.
