Hi all, Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks -- Gustavo On 3/5/21 03:44, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning > by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall > through to the next case. > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo...@kernel.org> > --- > net/packet/af_packet.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c > index e24b2841c643..880a1ab9a305 100644 > --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c > +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c > @@ -1652,6 +1652,7 @@ static int fanout_add(struct sock *sk, struct > fanout_args *args) > case PACKET_FANOUT_ROLLOVER: > if (type_flags & PACKET_FANOUT_FLAG_ROLLOVER) > return -EINVAL; > + break; > case PACKET_FANOUT_HASH: > case PACKET_FANOUT_LB: > case PACKET_FANOUT_CPU: >
