> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Wang <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2025 6:42 AM
> To: Shiva Shankar Kommula <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Jerin Jacob <[email protected]>; Nithin Kumar
> Dabilpuram <[email protected]>; Satananda Burla
> <[email protected]>; Srujana Challa <[email protected]>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 1/3] net: implement virtio helper
> to handle outer nw offset
> 
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 8: 51 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@ redhat. com>
> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 4: 23 AM Kommula Shiva Shankar >
> <kshankar@ marvell. com> wrote: > > > > virtio specification introduced
> support ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart Prioritize security for external emails:
> Confirm sender and content safety before clicking links or opening
> attachments <https://us-phishalarm-
> ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/CRVmXkqW!uK3X-
> 9E6SRp0XGTVtj3VIQ_zyUMjHsJk-qBfNXNYwQ-
> KaaNi0OVbkFRQlH6dtJYLMJxB4nt7OedRALLt3Wbol5OAgy2sLOiZzMfXrW0fM
> e51aGMKTCrL4Ni4Ink$>
> Report Suspicious
> 
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 8:51 AM Jason Wang <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 4:23 AM Kommula Shiva Shankar
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > virtio specification introduced support for outer network header
> > > offset broadcast.
> > >
> > > This patch implements the needed defines and virtio header parsing
> > > capabilities.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kommula Shiva Shankar <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/virtio_net.h      | 40
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h |  8 +++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_net.h b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> > > index 20e0584db1dd..e6153e9106d3 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> > > @@ -374,6 +374,46 @@ static inline int
> virtio_net_handle_csum_offload(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > >         return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static inline int
> > > +virtio_net_out_net_header_to_skb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > > +                                struct 
> > > virtio_net_hdr_v1_hash_tunnel_out_net_hdr
> *vhdr,
> > > +                                bool out_net_hdr_negotiated,
> > > +                                bool little_endian) {
> > > +       unsigned int out_net_hdr_off;
> > > +
> > > +       if (!out_net_hdr_negotiated)
> > > +               return 0;
> > > +
> > > +       if (vhdr->outer_nh_offset) {
> > > +               out_net_hdr_off = __virtio16_to_cpu(little_endian, vhdr-
> >outer_nh_offset);
> > > +               skb_set_network_header(skb, out_net_hdr_off);
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline int
> > > +virtio_net_out_net_header_from_skb(const struct sk_buff *skb,
> > > +                                  struct 
> > > virtio_net_hdr_v1_hash_tunnel_out_net_hdr
> *vhdr,
> > > +                                  bool out_net_hdr_negotiated,
> > > +                                  bool little_endian) {
> > > +       unsigned int out_net_hdr_off;
> > > +
> > > +       if (!out_net_hdr_negotiated) {
> > > +               vhdr->outer_nh_offset = 0;
> > > +               return 0;
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       out_net_hdr_off = skb_network_offset(skb);
> > > +       if (out_net_hdr_off && skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP))
> > > +               vhdr->outer_nh_offset = __cpu_to_virtio16(little_endian,
> > > +
> > > + out_net_hdr_off);
> >
> > I'd expect this to work for IPV6 as well.
This feature could be extended to both IPv4 and IPv6 as they both used in GSO. 
I will send v2 with IPv6 support.
> 
> Or why it only works for IP/IPV6.
AFAIK,  virtio device acceleration features are optimized for the IP protocol 
and transport layers like TCP/UDP. 
Although other protocols like IPX uses similar checksum algo used in IP 
checksum, they are not 
utilized in device offloading. 
> 
> >
> > Thanks
> 
> Thanks

Reply via email to