On 11/24/25 3:51 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 01:15:20PM -0600, Daniel Jurgens wrote:
>> Add support for IP_USER type rules from ethtool.
>>
>> Example:
>> $ ethtool -U ens9 flow-type ip4 src-ip 192.168.51.101 action -1
>> Added rule with ID 1
>>
>> The example rule will drop packets with the source IP specified.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Shahar Shitrit <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> v4:
>>     - Fixed bug in protocol check of parse_ip4
>>     - (u8 *) to (void *) casting.
>>     - Alignment issues.
>>
>> v12
>>     - refactor calculate_flow_sizes to remove goto. MST
>>     - refactor build_and_insert to remove goto validate. MST
>>     - Move parse_ip4 l3_mask check to TCP/UDP patch. MST
>>     - Check saddr/daddr mask before copying in parse_ip4. MST
>>     - Remove tos check in setup_ip_key_mask.
> 
> So if user attempts to set a filter by tos now, what blocks it?
> because parse_ip4 seems to ignore it ...
> 
>>     - check l4_4_bytes mask is 0 in setup_ip_key_mask. MST
>>     - changed return of setup_ip_key_mask to -EINVAL.
>>     - BUG_ON if key overflows u8 size in calculate_flow_sizes. MST
>> ---
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> index 5e49cd78904f..b0b9972fe624 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -5894,6 +5894,34 @@ static bool validate_eth_mask(const struct virtnet_ff 
>> *ff,
>>      return true;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static bool validate_ip4_mask(const struct virtnet_ff *ff,
>> +                          const struct virtio_net_ff_selector *sel,
>> +                          const struct virtio_net_ff_selector *sel_cap)
>> +{
>> +    bool partial_mask = !!(sel_cap->flags & 
>> VIRTIO_NET_FF_MASK_F_PARTIAL_MASK);
>> +    struct iphdr *cap, *mask;
>> +
>> +    cap = (struct iphdr *)&sel_cap->mask;
>> +    mask = (struct iphdr *)&sel->mask;
>> +
>> +    if (mask->saddr &&
>> +        !check_mask_vs_cap(&mask->saddr, &cap->saddr,
>> +                           sizeof(__be32), partial_mask))
>> +            return false;
>> +
>> +    if (mask->daddr &&
>> +        !check_mask_vs_cap(&mask->daddr, &cap->daddr,
>> +                           sizeof(__be32), partial_mask))
>> +            return false;
>> +
>> +    if (mask->protocol &&
>> +        !check_mask_vs_cap(&mask->protocol, &cap->protocol,
>> +                           sizeof(u8), partial_mask))
>> +            return false;
>> +
>> +    return true;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static bool validate_mask(const struct virtnet_ff *ff,
>>                        const struct virtio_net_ff_selector *sel)
>>  {
>> @@ -5905,11 +5933,36 @@ static bool validate_mask(const struct virtnet_ff 
>> *ff,
>>      switch (sel->type) {
>>      case VIRTIO_NET_FF_MASK_TYPE_ETH:
>>              return validate_eth_mask(ff, sel, sel_cap);
>> +
>> +    case VIRTIO_NET_FF_MASK_TYPE_IPV4:
>> +            return validate_ip4_mask(ff, sel, sel_cap);
>>      }
>>  
>>      return false;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void parse_ip4(struct iphdr *mask, struct iphdr *key,
>> +                  const struct ethtool_rx_flow_spec *fs)
>> +{
>> +    const struct ethtool_usrip4_spec *l3_mask = &fs->m_u.usr_ip4_spec;
>> +    const struct ethtool_usrip4_spec *l3_val  = &fs->h_u.usr_ip4_spec;
>> +
>> +    if (mask->saddr) {
>> +            mask->saddr = l3_mask->ip4src;
>> +            key->saddr = l3_val->ip4src;
>> +    }
> 
> So if mast->saddr is already set you over-write it?
> 
> But what sets it? Don't you really mean l3_mask->ip4src maybe?

Yes your right. My abbreviated test was only checking filtering by port
number on ipv4. Will fix that as well.

> 
> 
> 
>> +
>> +    if (mask->daddr) {
>> +            mask->daddr = l3_mask->ip4dst;
>> +            key->daddr = l3_val->ip4dst;
>> +    }
>> +}
> 
> 
> Same question.
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to