Although VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS is negotiated, which indicates
the device supports dynamic control of guest offloads, it does not
necessarily mean the device supports specific hardware GRO features.

If none of the features defined in GUEST_OFFLOAD_GRO_HW_MASK (such as
TSO4, TSO6, or UFO) are present in vi->guest_offloads_capable, the
device effectively lacks the hardware capability to perform GRO.

So, making NETIF_F_GRO_HW conditional on these feature bits ensures the
stack does not enable an unsupported hardware offload configuration.

Fixes: a02e8964eaf9 ("virtio-net: ethtool configurable LRO")
Signed-off-by: Di Zhu <[email protected]>
---
/* v2 */
  -make the modified logic clearer
---
 drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 72d6a9c6a5a2..b233c99925e9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -6781,8 +6781,6 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
        if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) ||
            virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6))
                dev->features |= NETIF_F_GRO_HW;
-       if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS))
-               dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_GRO_HW;
 
        dev->vlan_features = dev->features;
        dev->xdp_features = NETDEV_XDP_ACT_BASIC | NETDEV_XDP_ACT_REDIRECT |
@@ -7058,6 +7056,10 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
        }
        vi->guest_offloads_capable = vi->guest_offloads;
 
+       if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS) &&
+           (vi->guest_offloads_capable & GUEST_OFFLOAD_GRO_HW_MASK))
+               dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_GRO_HW;
+
        rtnl_unlock();
 
        err = virtnet_cpu_notif_add(vi);
-- 
2.34.1



Reply via email to