On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 3:02 PM Bartłomiej Dmitruk
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> vmci_transport_allow_dgram() gates delivery of incoming VMCI datagrams. It
> has two problems, both in this one function, fixed together here.
>
> 1. Namespace bypass: the send hook vmci_transport_dgram_allow() refuses
>    datagrams when the socket's netns is not in global mode
>    (vsock_net_mode_global()), but the receive path never checks it. A socket
>    bound in a non-global (local) netns therefore receives datagrams from
>    peers it could never send to, defeating namespace isolation.
>
> 2. Data race / stale ACL: the decision was cached in vsock->cached_peer and
>    vsock->cached_peer_allow_dgram with an unsynchronized check-then-set.
>    The function is called both from the lockless receive tasklet
>    (vmci_transport_recv_dgram_cb(), no socket lock) and from the lock_sock()
>    send path; lock_sock() does not exclude bottom halves, so the two contexts
>    race on those fields. An interleave can return a stale 'allow' for a
>    VMCI_PRIVILEGE_FLAG_RESTRICTED peer (and it is a plain data race
>    regardless). The in-code comment claiming the fields are never modified
>    outside create/destruct is contradicted by the send path.
>
> Add the symmetric net-mode check and drop the cache, evaluating the decision
> on every datagram; there is no shared mutable state left to race. The now
> unused cached_peer{,_allow_dgram} members can be removed in a follow-up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartłomiej Dmitruk <[email protected]>
> ---
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
> @@ -529,18 +529,25 @@
>         if (VMADDR_CID_HYPERVISOR == peer_cid)
>                 return true;

Shouldn't this be after the vsock_net_mode_global check below?

Thanks for the fix!

- Vishnu

>
> -       if (vsock->cached_peer != peer_cid) {
> -               vsock->cached_peer = peer_cid;
> -               if (!vmci_transport_is_trusted(vsock, peer_cid) &&
> -                   (vmci_context_get_priv_flags(peer_cid) &
> -                    VMCI_PRIVILEGE_FLAG_RESTRICTED)) {
> -                       vsock->cached_peer_allow_dgram = false;
> -               } else {
> -                       vsock->cached_peer_allow_dgram = true;
> -               }
> -       }
> +       /* Enforce the per-netns mode on the receive path, symmetrically with
> +        * the send hook vmci_transport_dgram_allow(): a socket in a 
> non-global
> +        * (local) netns must not receive datagrams it could never send.
> +        */
> +       if (!vsock_net_mode_global(vsock))
> +               return false;
>
> -       return vsock->cached_peer_allow_dgram;
> +       /* Evaluate on every datagram instead of caching the decision in
> +        * vsock->cached_peer{,_allow_dgram}: those fields were an
> +        * unsynchronized check-then-set shared between the lockless receive
> +        * tasklet and the lock_sock() send path, which could return a stale
> +        * 'allow' for a restricted peer.
> +        */
> +       if (!vmci_transport_is_trusted(vsock, peer_cid) &&
> +           (vmci_context_get_priv_flags(peer_cid) &
> +            VMCI_PRIVILEGE_FLAG_RESTRICTED))
> +               return false;
> +
> +       return true;
>  }
>
>  static int

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to