On Tuesday 10 July 2007 00:19:22 Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > Hi, > > Victor Porton reported that the SoftMAC layer had random > problem when setting the ESSID : > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8686 > After investigation, it turned out to be worse, the SoftMAC > layer is left in an inconsistent state. The fix is pretty trivial. > John : would you mind pushing that to 2.6.23 ? > Thanks... > > Jean > > Signed-off-by: Jean Tourrilhes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > --- linux/net/ieee80211/softmac/ieee80211softmac_assoc.j1.c 2007-07-09 > 13:56:13.000000000 -0700 > +++ linux/net/ieee80211/softmac/ieee80211softmac_assoc.c 2007-07-09 > 13:56:41.000000000 -0700 > @@ -271,8 +271,11 @@ ieee80211softmac_assoc_work(struct work_ > */ > dprintk(KERN_INFO PFX "Associate: Scanning for networks > first.\n"); > ieee80211softmac_notify(mac->dev, > IEEE80211SOFTMAC_EVENT_SCAN_FINISHED, ieee80211softmac_assoc_notify_scan, > NULL); > - if (ieee80211softmac_start_scan(mac)) > + if (ieee80211softmac_start_scan(mac)) { > dprintk(KERN_INFO PFX "Associate: failed to > initiate scan. Is device up?\n"); > + mac->associnfo.associating = 0; > + mac->associnfo.associated = 0; > + } > goto out; > } else { > mac->associnfo.associating = 0; >
Acked-by: Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Greetings Michael. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
