On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 04:37:36PM -0700, Mike Anderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > > --- linux.orig/include/linux/netlink.h 2007-07-11 21:37:31.000000000
> > > +0100
> > > +++ linux/include/linux/netlink.h 2007-07-11 21:37:50.000000000 +0100
> > > @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
> > > #define NETLINK_DNRTMSG 14 /* DECnet routing messages */
> > > #define NETLINK_KOBJECT_UEVENT 15 /* Kernel messages to userspace
> > > */
> > > #define NETLINK_GENERIC 16
> > > -/* leave room for NETLINK_DM (DM Events) */
> > > +#define NETLINK_DM 17 /* Device Mapper */
> > > #define NETLINK_SCSITRANSPORT 18 /* SCSI Transports */
> > > #define NETLINK_ECRYPTFS 19
> >
> > Have the net guys checked this?
>
> No. The support is a derivative of the netlink support in
> scsi_transport_iscsi.c.
I'm not sure about all net guys, but the first question rised after
reading this - why do you want special netlink family and do not want to
use interfaces created on top of - like connector and genetlink?
> -andmike
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
