* Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:35:11 +0100 Thierry Reding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In cases where more than a single PHY is found on the MDIO bus, the kernel
> > will print a warning that this method is missing for each PHY device that
> > is not attached to a networking device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
> > index fc2f0e6..cb7fb47 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c
> > @@ -36,6 +36,23 @@
> > #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> >
> > /**
> > + * phy_device_release - free a phy_device structure when all users of it
> > are
> > + * finished.
> > + *
> > + * @dev: device that's been disconnected
> > + *
> > + * Will be called only by the device core when all users of this phy_device
> > + * are done.
> > + */
> > +static void phy_device_release(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct phy_device *phy;
> > +
> > + phy = to_phy_device(dev);
> > + kfree(phy);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > * mdiobus_register - bring up all the PHYs on a given bus and attach them
> > to bus
> > * @bus: target mii_bus
> > *
> > @@ -83,6 +100,7 @@ int mdiobus_register(struct mii_bus *bus)
> > if (phydev) {
> > phydev->irq = bus->irq[i];
> >
> > + phydev->dev.release = phy_device_release;
> > phydev->dev.parent = bus->dev;
> > phydev->dev.bus = &mdio_bus_type;
> > snprintf(phydev->dev.bus_id, BUS_ID_SIZE, PHY_ID_FMT,
> > bus->id, i);
> > @@ -112,7 +130,6 @@ void mdiobus_unregister(struct mii_bus *bus)
> > for (i = 0; i < PHY_MAX_ADDR; i++) {
> > if (bus->phy_map[i]) {
> > device_unregister(&bus->phy_map[i]->dev);
> > - kfree(bus->phy_map[i]);
> > }
> > }
> > }
> >
>
> I've been sitting on
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc3/2.6.24-rc3-mm2/broken-out/phy-implement-release-function.patch
> for a few weeks. For some reason I have it in my "nacked netdev patches"
> section but I think that was a mistake and it has not (yet ;)) been nacked.
>
> Anyway, Anton's patch looks somewhat different from yours. Please compare
> notes.FWIW, I like Anton's patch better, especially since it plugs a possible memory leak. I'm not sure it's useful or necessary to export the phy_device_free symbol, though. The only other difference that I can see is that Anton's patch sets the release function in a different place, when the device is created, whereas my patch only sets it before registering the device. Both should be identical since the release function won't be needed unless the device is registered. Thierry
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
