On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 00:15:49 +0200 (EET) "Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 08:53:07 -0800 > > Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > it occurred to me that we might want to do something > > > > like a state change event generator. > > > > > > This could be a basis for an interesting TCP > > > performance tester. > > > > That is what tcpprobe does but it isn't detailed enough to address SACK > > issues. > > ...It would be nice if that could be generalized so that the probe could > be attached to some other functions than tcp_rcv_established instead. > > If we convert remaining functions that don't have sk or tp as first > argument so that sk is listed first (should be many with wrong ordering > if any), then maybe a generic handler could be of type: > > jtcp_entry(struct sock *sk, ...) > > or when available: > > jtcp_entry(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack, ...) > > > -- > i. An earlier version had hooks in send as well, it is trivial to extend. as long as the prototypes match, any function arg ordering is okay. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
