I will try to talk in lartc, about HTB i wrote another mail... It is not acting as TBF with burst, it is even acting weird. Probably it is bug, when traffic get "blocked" cause of burst.
I will try to use lartc, if it is better to not "spam" my stuff here :-) I didn't try yet PSPacer yet, as ESFQ things. If it is need i can do that and write feedback. I can use some of them in real environment after some pre- testing. On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 22:09:01 +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote > Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote, On 12/26/2007 05:57 AM: > .... > > > But i got few times in dmesg, during tests (probably when i set sfq instead > > pfifo, or etc). > > > > [2090816.116000] htb: class 10003 isn't work conserving ?! > > > > Is it a bug? And does it worth to do such "shaper"? > > It's not a bug - htb simply wonders the sub-queue has packets, > but doesn't dequeue any when expected. Probably htb + tbf isn't > the most common configuration, but nothing wrong either. You > should only consider htb could do similar (not exactly) job by > itself, and each additional qdisc adds some latency, so it's only > a question of priorities. But, hmm, ...don't you think this > lartc.org's mailing list is really nice? > > Regards, > Jarek P. > > PS: BTW, maybe I missed this, but I hoped you'd share here some > impressions from testing this new PSPacer scheduler? > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Denys Fedoryshchenko Technical Manager Virtual ISP S.A.L. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
