David Miller wrote:
Why did you post this again? It's identical to patch 1/9
from the previous series you sent out.
This is confusing, since it makes me think you wanted me to
perhaps do something different or update an already
submitted patch.
I thought you was expecting a new netns ipv6 sysctl series and ignored
the current one. While I was looking at them again I found a problem and
I wanted to fix that before resending. In the meantime, there were three
independant trivial patches I wanted to send as a pre-requesite for the
incoming sysctl patches. Bad idea ... :)
- make ipv6_sysctl_register to return a value
- make a subsystem for af_inet6
- add ipv6 structure for netns
With the sysctl Pavel's patch, the first one does not apply.
To clear out any confusion, please can you just ignore all my previous
patches, I will resend a new serie rebased on the work done by Pavel.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Thanks.
-- Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
