From: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:33:01 +0100
> CHECK net/x25/af_x25.c > net/x25/af_x25.c:117:46: warning: expensive signed divide > CHECK net/x25/x25_facilities.c > net/x25/x25_facilities.c:209:30: warning: expensive signed divide > CHECK net/x25/x25_in.c > net/x25/x25_in.c:250:26: warning: expensive signed divide > CHECK net/x25/x25_proc.c > net/x25/x25_proc.c:48:11: warning: context imbalance in 'x25_seq_route_start' > - wrong count at exit > net/x25/x25_proc.c:72:13: warning: context imbalance in 'x25_seq_route_stop' > - > unexpected unlock > net/x25/x25_proc.c:112:11: warning: context imbalance in > 'x25_seq_socket_start' - wrong count at exit > net/x25/x25_proc.c:129:13: warning: context imbalance in > 'x25_seq_socket_stop' > - unexpected unlock > net/x25/x25_proc.c:190:11: warning: context imbalance in > 'x25_seq_forward_start' - wrong count at exit > net/x25/x25_proc.c:215:13: warning: context imbalance in > 'x25_seq_forward_stop' - unexpected unlock > CHECK net/x25/x25_subr.c > net/x25/x25_subr.c:362:57: warning: expensive signed divide > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, thanks Eric. We might just want to make sk_rcvbuf et al. unsigned, it crops up a lot and I can't see any valid reason for it to be negative or for uses of it to matter with other signed values. Or did we discuss that to death already? :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
