Stephen Hemminger writes: > Dumping by prefix is possible, but unless 32x slower. Dumping in > address order is just as logical. Like I said, I'm investigating what > quagga handles.
How about taking a snapshot to in address order (as you did) to some allocated memory, returning from that memory in prefix order? This would solve the -EBUSY too and give a consistent view of the routing table at the time for the dump/snapshot. Cheers --ro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html