On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:57:58 +1100 Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I assume that these ancient network drivers were trying to find out if > an irq is available. eepro.c expecting +EBUSY was doubly wrong. > > I'm not sure that can_request_irq() is the right thing, but these drivers > are definitely wrong. > > request_irq should BUG() on bad input, and these would have been found > earlier. This breaks non-CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS architectures. alpha: drivers/net/3c503.c: In function 'el2_open': drivers/net/3c503.c:382: error: implicit declaration of function 'can_request_irq' -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
