On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> I don't think that is what Doug said. > Indeed. There is no need to scrap things, but if the design as it > stands, and the intended means of creating objects for use in > containers, is going to result in an unworkable network, then we have to > re-evaluate how the container constructs are created, and that then has > possible consequences for how we would get from an incoming packet to > the proper container. To be precise, do we agree that the issue here isn't "in the design as it stands" but rather in a problem we found in the intended way of assigning IP addresses through DHCP for the containers? > I'm not trying to stop the "support train" here, but at the same time, > if the train is headed for a bridge that's out.... So what's your concrete saying here? where should we go from here? Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
