On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 06:35:03AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 08:51:07AM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> > This makes the function sctp_assoc_lookup_laddr bool due to this
> > function only returning either one or zero as its return value.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofo...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > include/net/sctp/structs.h | 4 ++--
> > net/sctp/associola.c | 8 ++++----
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> > index 2bb2fcf..1381be9 100644
> > --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> > +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> > @@ -1870,8 +1870,8 @@ struct sctp_transport
> > *sctp_assoc_choose_alter_transport(
> > void sctp_assoc_update_retran_path(struct sctp_association *);
> > struct sctp_transport *sctp_assoc_lookup_paddr(const struct
> > sctp_association *,
> > const union sctp_addr *);
> > -int sctp_assoc_lookup_laddr(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> > - const union sctp_addr *laddr);
> > +bool sctp_assoc_lookup_laddr(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> > + const union sctp_addr *laddr);
> > struct sctp_transport *sctp_assoc_add_peer(struct sctp_association *,
> > const union sctp_addr *address,
> > const gfp_t gfp,
> > diff --git a/net/sctp/associola.c b/net/sctp/associola.c
> > index 197c3f5..69abe78 100644
> > --- a/net/sctp/associola.c
> > +++ b/net/sctp/associola.c
> > @@ -1572,15 +1572,15 @@ int sctp_assoc_set_bind_addr_from_cookie(struct
> > sctp_association *asoc,
> > }
> >
> > /* Lookup laddr in the bind address list of an association. */
> > -int sctp_assoc_lookup_laddr(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> > - const union sctp_addr *laddr)
> > +bool sctp_assoc_lookup_laddr(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> > + const union sctp_addr *laddr)
> > {
> > - int found = 0;
> > + bool found = false;
> >
> > if ((asoc->base.bind_addr.port == ntohs(laddr->v4.sin_port)) &&
> > sctp_bind_addr_match(&asoc->base.bind_addr, laddr,
> > sctp_sk(asoc->base.sk)))
> > - found = 1;
> > + found = true;
> >
> > return found;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.1.4
> >
> >
>
> If you're going to do this, you might as well also remove the conditional
> statement here entirely. I.e. just have the function be this:
>
> return (asoc->base.bind_addr.port == ntohs(laddr->v4.sin_port)) &&
> sctp_bind_addr_match(&asoc->base.bind_addr, laddr,
> sctp_sk(asoc->base.sk)));
>
> You might also look into makeing it inline, though it doesn't appear in any
> hot
> paths so thats likely overkill
+1
just in case you cut&paste, be careful that the 3rd line should start
right after the ( in the 2nd line. (Like it was before)
Marcelo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
