> On Jun 3, 2015, at 11:46 AM, Mark D Rustad <mark.d.rus...@intel.com> wrote: > > Many multi-function devices provide shared registers in extended > config space for accessing VPD. The behavior of these registers > means that the state must be tracked and access locked correctly > for accesses not to hang or worse. One way to meet these needs is > to always perform the accesses through function 0, thereby using > the state tracking and mutex that already exists. > > To provide this behavior, add a dev_flags bit to indicate that this > should be done. This bit can then be set for any non-zero function > that needs to redirect such VPD access to function 0. Do not set > this bit on the zero function or there will be an infinite recursion. > > The second patch uses this new flag to invoke this behavior on all > multi-function Intel Ethernet devices. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rus...@intel.com> > > --- > Changes in V2: > - Corrected a spelling error in a log message > - Added checks to see that the referenced function 0 is reasonable > Changes in V3: > - Don't leak a device reference > - Check that function 0 has VPD > - Make a helper for the function 0 checks > - Moved a multifunction check to the quirk patch
So does this series look acceptable now? I think I addressed the issues that Alex raised. Can these also be considered for -stable? -- Mark Rustad, Networking Division, Intel Corporation
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
