br_fdb_update() can be called in process context in the following way:
br_fdb_add() -> __br_fdb_add() -> br_fdb_update() (if NTF_USE flag is set)
so we need to disable softirqs because there are softirq users of the
hash_lock. One easy way to reproduce this is to modify the bridge utility
to set NTF_USE, enable stp and then set maxageing to a low value so
br_fdb_cleanup() is called frequently and then just add new entries in
a loop. This happens because br_fdb_cleanup() is called from timer/softirq
context. The spin locks in br_fdb_update were _bh before commit f8ae737deea1
("[BRIDGE]: forwarding remove unneeded preempt and bh diasables")
and at the time that commit was correct because br_fdb_update() couldn't be
called from process context, but that changed after commit:
292d1398983f ("bridge: add NTF_USE support")
Using local_bh_disable/enable around br_fdb_update() allows us to keep
using the spin_lock/unlock in br_fdb_update for the fast-path.Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]> Fixes: 292d1398983f ("bridge: add NTF_USE support") --- v2: new patch, uses local_bh_disable/enable instead of _bh variant of spinlocks to keep the fast-path optimization. Please drop "bridge: use _bh spinlock variant for br_fdb_update to avoid lockup" in favor of this one. net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c index e0670d7054f9..659fb96672e4 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c @@ -796,9 +796,11 @@ static int __br_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct net_bridge_port *p, int err = 0; if (ndm->ndm_flags & NTF_USE) { + local_bh_disable(); rcu_read_lock(); br_fdb_update(p->br, p, addr, vid, true); rcu_read_unlock(); + local_bh_enable(); } else { spin_lock_bh(&p->br->hash_lock); err = fdb_add_entry(p, addr, ndm->ndm_state, -- 1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
