On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 01:31:31PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On 09/06/15 12:22, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:54:50AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am observing a strange problem on net-next (not observed with net, > >> bisection in progress) where the initial DHCP configuration using > >> busybox's udhcpc is able to configure the local interface address and > >> DNS serer, but not the default gateway. Restarting udhcpc a second time > >> does not exhibit this problem. > > > > Hi Florian > > > > I've seen something similar, but different, again with DSA involved, > > on a WiFi Access point. I have debian, and i'm using isc dhcp. It gets > > an address, sets the address on the interface, but does not add the > > interface route to the routing table. Not sure about default route, i > > would have to go check that. > > Interesting, did you also observe this with 'net', or just with 'net-next'?
Just net-next, for some value of net-next. But i've not used net much, since i see this problem during developing new features. > Contrary to what I reported above, this is only an issue with > SYSTEMPORT/DSA/SF2, I could not reproduce this GENET or the Asix driver, > Note that I am observing this on ARM (Andrew probably is as well), Yep. Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html