On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 03:53:04PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 15:27 -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > We saw excessive direct memory compaction triggered by skb_page_frag_refill.
> > This causes performance issues and add latency. Commit 5640f7685831e0
> > introduces the order-3 allocation. According to the changelog, the order-3
> > allocation isn't a must-have but to improve performance. But direct memory
> > compaction has high overhead. The benefit of order-3 allocation can't
> > compensate the overhead of direct memory compaction.
> > 
> > This patch makes the order-3 page allocation atomic. If there is no memory
> > pressure and memory isn't fragmented, the alloction will still success, so 
> > we
> > don't sacrifice the order-3 benefit here. If the atomic allocation fails,
> > direct memory compaction will not be triggered, skb_page_frag_refill will
> > fallback to order-0 immediately, hence the direct memory compaction 
> > overhead is
> > avoided. In the allocation failure case, kswapd is waken up and doing
> > compaction, so chances are allocation could success next time.
> > 
> > The mellanox driver does similar thing, if this is accepted, we must fix
> > the driver too.
> > 
> > V2: make the changelog clearer
> > 
> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <s...@fb.com>
> > ---
> >  net/core/sock.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> > index 292f422..e9855a4 100644
> > --- a/net/core/sock.c
> > +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> > @@ -1883,7 +1883,7 @@ bool skb_page_frag_refill(unsigned int sz, struct 
> > page_frag *pfrag, gfp_t gfp)
> >  
> >     pfrag->offset = 0;
> >     if (SKB_FRAG_PAGE_ORDER) {
> > -           pfrag->page = alloc_pages(gfp | __GFP_COMP |
> > +           pfrag->page = alloc_pages((gfp & ~__GFP_WAIT) | __GFP_COMP |
> >                                       __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY,
> >                                       SKB_FRAG_PAGE_ORDER);
> >             if (likely(pfrag->page)) {
> 
> 
> OK, now what about alloc_skb_with_frags() ?
> 
> This should have same problem right ?

Ok, looks similar, added. Didn't trigger this one though.


>From 940dde18f7f655377a4c30d5de54c9eff15ab5a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: 
<940dde18f7f655377a4c30d5de54c9eff15ab5a5.1434065353.git.s...@fb.com>
From: Shaohua Li <s...@fb.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:16:21 -0700
Subject: [RFC] net: use atomic allocation for order-3 page allocation

We saw excessive direct memory compaction triggered by skb_page_frag_refill.
This causes performance issues and add latency. Commit 5640f7685831e0
introduces the order-3 allocation. According to the changelog, the order-3
allocation isn't a must-have but to improve performance. But direct memory
compaction has high overhead. The benefit of order-3 allocation can't
compensate the overhead of direct memory compaction.

This patch makes the order-3 page allocation atomic. If there is no memory
pressure and memory isn't fragmented, the alloction will still success, so we
don't sacrifice the order-3 benefit here. If the atomic allocation fails,
direct memory compaction will not be triggered, skb_page_frag_refill will
fallback to order-0 immediately, hence the direct memory compaction overhead is
avoided. In the allocation failure case, kswapd is waken up and doing
compaction, so chances are allocation could success next time.

alloc_skb_with_frags is the same.

The mellanox driver does similar thing, if this is accepted, we must fix
the driver too.

V3: fix the same issue in alloc_skb_with_frags as pointed out by Eric
V2: make the changelog clearer

Cc: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <c...@fb.com>
Cc: Debabrata Banerjee <dbava...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <s...@fb.com>
---
 net/core/skbuff.c | 4 +++-
 net/core/sock.c   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 3cfff2a..9856c7a 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -4398,7 +4398,9 @@ struct sk_buff *alloc_skb_with_frags(unsigned long 
header_len,
 
                while (order) {
                        if (npages >= 1 << order) {
-                               page = alloc_pages(gfp_mask |
+                               gfp_t gfp = order > 0 ?
+                                       gfp_mask & ~__GFP_WAIT : gfp_mask;
+                               page = alloc_pages(gfp |
                                                   __GFP_COMP |
                                                   __GFP_NOWARN |
                                                   __GFP_NORETRY,
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 292f422..e9855a4 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1883,7 +1883,7 @@ bool skb_page_frag_refill(unsigned int sz, struct 
page_frag *pfrag, gfp_t gfp)
 
        pfrag->offset = 0;
        if (SKB_FRAG_PAGE_ORDER) {
-               pfrag->page = alloc_pages(gfp | __GFP_COMP |
+               pfrag->page = alloc_pages((gfp & ~__GFP_WAIT) | __GFP_COMP |
                                          __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY,
                                          SKB_FRAG_PAGE_ORDER);
                if (likely(pfrag->page)) {
-- 
1.8.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to