[ added netdev to cc ]

Mazhar Rana <ranamazh...@gmail.com> wrote:

>When "primary_reselect" is set to "failure", primary interface should
>not become active until current active slave is up. But if we set first

        I think you mean "until current active slave is down" here, not
"up."

>member of bond device as a "primary" interface and "primary_reselect"
>is set to "failure" then whenever primary interface's link get back(up)
>it become active slave even if current active slave is still up.
>
>With this patch, "bond_find_best_slave" will not traverse members if
>primary interface is not candidate for failover/reselection and current
>active slave is still up.
>
>Signed-off-by: Mazhar Rana <mazhar.r...@cyberoam.com>
>Reviewed-by: Sanket Shah <sanket.s...@cyberoam.com>
>---
>v2: return "curr" instead of "bond->curr_active_slave".
>
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>index 19eb990..ac71261 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static bool bond_should_change_active(struct bonding *bond)
>  */
> static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
> {
>-      struct slave *slave, *bestslave = NULL, *primary;
>+      struct slave *slave, *bestslave = NULL, *primary, *curr;
>       struct list_head *iter;
>       int mintime = bond->params.updelay;
> 
>@@ -724,6 +724,14 @@ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding 
>*bond)
>           bond_should_change_active(bond))
>               return primary;
> 
>+      /* We are here means primary interface is not candidate for
>+       * reslection/failover. If currenet active slave is still up
>+       * then there is no meaning to traverse  members.
>+       */
>+      curr = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
>+      if (curr && curr->link == BOND_LINK_UP)
>+              return curr;
>+
>       bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
>               if (slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP)
>                       return slave;
>-- 

        I believe the above patch will work, but I also think these
functions are kind of hacky, as bond_should_change_active() doesn't
really give the answer its name implies, so we have to second guess
here.

        I think the following, while a bigger change, ends up with
clearer code.  Compile tested only.  Comments?

        -J

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 19eb990..8c30f6b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -689,40 +689,54 @@ out:
 
 }
 
-static bool bond_should_change_active(struct bonding *bond)
+static struct slave *bond_choose_primary_or_current(struct bonding *bond)
 {
        struct slave *prim = rtnl_dereference(bond->primary_slave);
        struct slave *curr = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
 
-       if (!prim || !curr || curr->link != BOND_LINK_UP)
-               return true;
+       if (!prim || !prim->link == BOND_LINK_UP)
+               return curr;
+
        if (bond->force_primary) {
                bond->force_primary = false;
-               return true;
+               return prim;
+       }
+
+       if (!curr || curr->link != BOND_LINK_UP)
+               return prim;
+
+       /* At this point, prim and curr are both up */
+       switch (bond->params.primary_reselect) {
+       case BOND_PRI_RESELECT_ALWAYS:
+               return prim;
+       case BOND_PRI_RESELECT_BETTER:
+               if (prim->speed < curr->speed)
+                       return curr;
+               if (prim->speed == curr->speed && prim->duplex <= curr->duplex)
+                       return curr;
+               return prim;
+       case BOND_PRI_RESELECT_FAILURE:
+               return curr;
+       default:
+               netdev_err(bond->dev, "impossible primary_reselect %d\n",
+                          bond->params.primary_reselect);
+               return curr;
        }
-       if (bond->params.primary_reselect == BOND_PRI_RESELECT_BETTER &&
-           (prim->speed < curr->speed ||
-            (prim->speed == curr->speed && prim->duplex <= curr->duplex)))
-               return false;
-       if (bond->params.primary_reselect == BOND_PRI_RESELECT_FAILURE)
-               return false;
-       return true;
 }
 
 /**
- * find_best_interface - select the best available slave to be the active one
+ * bond_find_best_slave - select the best available slave to be the active one
  * @bond: our bonding struct
  */
 static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
 {
-       struct slave *slave, *bestslave = NULL, *primary;
+       struct slave *slave, *bestslave = NULL;
        struct list_head *iter;
        int mintime = bond->params.updelay;
 
-       primary = rtnl_dereference(bond->primary_slave);
-       if (primary && primary->link == BOND_LINK_UP &&
-           bond_should_change_active(bond))
-               return primary;
+       slave = bond_choose_primary_or_current(bond);
+       if (slave)
+               return slave;
 
        bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
                if (slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP)

---
        -Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosbu...@canonical.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to