Hi David, On 02/07/15 21:12, ext David Miller wrote: >> It's not allowed to assign data pointer of skbuff directly, this makes no >> sense >> > if the assigned pointer is the very same as already existing one, or it >> > brakes >> > all the pointer arithmetics in all other cases. We cannot do better as just >> > compare them and report BUG() in case of mismatch. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <[email protected]> > BUG takes the entire machine out, which is worse than corrupting the > skb->data > > If you really want to assert this condition, do it in a way that > doesn't kill the entire machine.
In fact, the machine goes down, some milliseconds later, but because of the following inconsistencies, which are misleading. The function has no way to signal an error and this line of code is simply wrong. To prevent others from copying this error, we can simply delete it. Would it be fine from your PoV? -- Best regards, Alexander Sverdlin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
