I am testing this patch which may be a little simpler. Also idev needs
to be checked after __in6_dev_get

Tom

diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 4ab74d5..d631ac3 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -1363,9 +1363,10 @@ static void __ipv6_dev_get_saddr(struct net *net,
                                 unsigned int prefs,
                                 const struct in6_addr *saddr,
                                 struct inet6_dev *idev,
-                                struct ipv6_saddr_score *scores)
+                                struct ipv6_saddr_score **in_score,
+                                struct ipv6_saddr_score **in_hiscore)
 {
-       struct ipv6_saddr_score *score = &scores[0], *hiscore = &scores[1];
+       struct ipv6_saddr_score *score = *in_score, *hiscore = *in_hiscore;

        read_lock_bh(&idev->lock);
        list_for_each_entry(score->ifa, &idev->addr_list, if_list) {
@@ -1434,13 +1435,16 @@ static void __ipv6_dev_get_saddr(struct net *net,
        }
 out:
        read_unlock_bh(&idev->lock);
+       *in_hiscore = hiscore;
+       *in_score = score;
 }

 int ipv6_dev_get_saddr(struct net *net, const struct net_device *dst_dev,
                       const struct in6_addr *daddr, unsigned int prefs,
                       struct in6_addr *saddr)
 {
-       struct ipv6_saddr_score scores[2], *hiscore = &scores[1];
+       struct ipv6_saddr_score scores[2];
+       struct ipv6_saddr_score *score = &scores[0], *hiscore = &scores[1];
        struct ipv6_saddr_dst dst;
        struct inet6_dev *idev;
        struct net_device *dev;
@@ -1475,18 +1479,19 @@ int ipv6_dev_get_saddr(struct net *net, const
struct net_device *dst_dev,
                if ((dst_type & IPV6_ADDR_MULTICAST) ||
                    dst.scope <= IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_LINKLOCAL) {
                        idev = __in6_dev_get(dst_dev);
-                       use_oif_addr = true;
+                       if (idev)
+                               use_oif_addr = true;
                }
        }
        if (use_oif_addr) {
-               __ipv6_dev_get_saddr(net, &dst, prefs, saddr, idev, scores);
+               __ipv6_dev_get_saddr(net, &dst, prefs, saddr, idev,
&score, &hiscore);
        } else {
                for_each_netdev_rcu(net, dev) {
                        idev = __in6_dev_get(dev);
                        if (!idev)
                                continue;
-                       __ipv6_dev_get_saddr(net, &dst, prefs, saddr,
idev, scores);
+                       __ipv6_dev_get_saddr(net, &dst, prefs, saddr,
idev, &score, &hiscore);
                }
        }
        rcu_read_unlock();

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 7:28 AM, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki/吉藤英明
<hideaki.yoshif...@miraclelinux.com> wrote:
> Commit 9131f3de2 ("ipv6: Do not iterate over all interfaces when
> finding source address on specific interface.") did not properly
> update best source address available.  Plus, it introduced
> possible NULL pointer dereference.
>
> Bug was reported by Erik Kline <e...@google.com>.
> Based on patch proposed by Hajime Tazaki <thehaj...@gmail.com>.
>
> Fixes: 9131f3de24db4dc12199aede7d931e6703e97f3b ("ipv6: Do not
>         iterate over all interfaces when finding source address
>         on specific interface.")
> Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <hideaki.yoshif...@miraclelinux.com>
> ---
>  net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index 4ab74d5..4c9a024 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> @@ -1358,14 +1358,15 @@ out:
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> -static void __ipv6_dev_get_saddr(struct net *net,
> -                                struct ipv6_saddr_dst *dst,
> -                                unsigned int prefs,
> -                                const struct in6_addr *saddr,
> -                                struct inet6_dev *idev,
> -                                struct ipv6_saddr_score *scores)
> +static int __ipv6_dev_get_saddr(struct net *net,
> +                               struct ipv6_saddr_dst *dst,
> +                               unsigned int prefs,
> +                               const struct in6_addr *saddr,
> +                               struct inet6_dev *idev,
> +                               struct ipv6_saddr_score *scores,
> +                               int hiscore_idx)
>  {
> -       struct ipv6_saddr_score *score = &scores[0], *hiscore = &scores[1];
> +       struct ipv6_saddr_score *score = &scores[1 - hiscore_idx], *hiscore = 
> &scores[hiscore_idx];
>
>         read_lock_bh(&idev->lock);
>         list_for_each_entry(score->ifa, &idev->addr_list, if_list) {
> @@ -1424,6 +1425,7 @@ static void __ipv6_dev_get_saddr(struct net *net,
>                                 in6_ifa_hold(score->ifa);
>
>                                 swap(hiscore, score);
> +                               hiscore_idx = 1 - hiscore_idx;
>
>                                 /* restore our iterator */
>                                 score->ifa = hiscore->ifa;
> @@ -1434,18 +1436,20 @@ static void __ipv6_dev_get_saddr(struct net *net,
>         }
>  out:
>         read_unlock_bh(&idev->lock);
> +       return hiscore_idx;
>  }
>
>  int ipv6_dev_get_saddr(struct net *net, const struct net_device *dst_dev,
>                        const struct in6_addr *daddr, unsigned int prefs,
>                        struct in6_addr *saddr)
>  {
> -       struct ipv6_saddr_score scores[2], *hiscore = &scores[1];
> +       struct ipv6_saddr_score scores[2], *hiscore;
>         struct ipv6_saddr_dst dst;
>         struct inet6_dev *idev;
>         struct net_device *dev;
>         int dst_type;
>         bool use_oif_addr = false;
> +       int hiscore_idx = 0;
>
>         dst_type = __ipv6_addr_type(daddr);
>         dst.addr = daddr;
> @@ -1454,8 +1458,8 @@ int ipv6_dev_get_saddr(struct net *net, const struct 
> net_device *dst_dev,
>         dst.label = ipv6_addr_label(net, daddr, dst_type, dst.ifindex);
>         dst.prefs = prefs;
>
> -       hiscore->rule = -1;
> -       hiscore->ifa = NULL;
> +       scores[hiscore_idx].rule = -1;
> +       scores[hiscore_idx].ifa = NULL;
>
>         rcu_read_lock();
>
> @@ -1480,17 +1484,19 @@ int ipv6_dev_get_saddr(struct net *net, const struct 
> net_device *dst_dev,
>         }
>
>         if (use_oif_addr) {
> -               __ipv6_dev_get_saddr(net, &dst, prefs, saddr, idev, scores);
> +               if (idev)
> +                       hiscore_idx = __ipv6_dev_get_saddr(net, &dst, prefs, 
> saddr, idev, scores, hiscore_idx);
>         } else {
>                 for_each_netdev_rcu(net, dev) {
>                         idev = __in6_dev_get(dev);
>                         if (!idev)
>                                 continue;
> -                       __ipv6_dev_get_saddr(net, &dst, prefs, saddr, idev, 
> scores);
> +                       hiscore_idx = __ipv6_dev_get_saddr(net, &dst, prefs, 
> saddr, idev, scores, hiscore_idx);
>                 }
>         }
>         rcu_read_unlock();
>
> +       hiscore = &scores[hiscore_idx];
>         if (!hiscore->ifa)
>                 return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to