On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Denys Vlasenko
<vda.li...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Sergei Shtylyov
> <sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com> wrote:
>>> +#define IWL_READ_WRITE(static_inline) \
>>> +static_inline void iwl_write8(struct iwl_trans *trans, u32 ofs, u8 val) \
>>> +{ \
>>> + trace_iwlwifi_dev_iowrite8(trans->dev, ofs, val); \
>>> + iwl_trans_write8(trans, ofs, val); \
>>> +} \
>> [...]
>>>
>>> +#if !defined(CONFIG_IWLWIFI_DEVICE_TRACING)
>>> +IWL_READ_WRITE(static inline)
>>
>> Not static_inline?
>
> Yes. Here we are putting two words, "static inline", in front of every
> function definition.
> --
I'll try to come up with a patch that is easier for me to read, but I
am really busy right now. Ping me in a week if you have heard from me
earlier.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
