Waking the dealloc thread before decrementing inflight_packets is racy
because it means the thread may go to sleep before inflight_packets is
decremented. If kthread_stop() has already been called, the dealloc
thread may wait forever with nothing to wake it. Instead, wake the
thread only after decrementing inflight_packets.

Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerw...@citrix.com>
---
 drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c 
b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
index 7d50711..e95ee20 100644
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
+++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
@@ -1536,7 +1536,6 @@ void xenvif_zerocopy_callback(struct ubuf_info *ubuf, 
bool zerocopy_success)
                smp_wmb();
                queue->dealloc_prod++;
        } while (ubuf);
-       wake_up(&queue->dealloc_wq);
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->callback_lock, flags);
 
        if (likely(zerocopy_success))
@@ -1544,6 +1543,7 @@ void xenvif_zerocopy_callback(struct ubuf_info *ubuf, 
bool zerocopy_success)
        else
                queue->stats.tx_zerocopy_fail++;
        xenvif_skb_zerocopy_complete(queue);
+       wake_up(&queue->dealloc_wq);
 }
 
 static inline void xenvif_tx_dealloc_action(struct xenvif_queue *queue)
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to