On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 14:10 +0300, Corcodel Marian wrote:
> Put rx_buf_sz on rtl_cfg_info structure and add new
>  parameter  rx_buf_coef.Param rx_buf_sz may be different by nic's and same
>  rx_buf_coef On RTL 8101 series rx_buf_coef is not equal with  rx_buf_sz.
>  Add --whitespace=warn on git
> 
> Signed-off-by: Corcodel Marian <corcodel.mar...@gmail.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
> index 6882eab..fecb7c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id rtl8169_pci_tbl[] = {
>  
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, rtl8169_pci_tbl);
>  
> -static int rx_buf_sz = 16383;
> +//static int rx_buf_sz = 16383;

Really ?

You keep sending obscure r9169 patches, with no clear explanations.

Why should we review all this ?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to