On 08/24/2015 02:47 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 06:08:30PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
as RFC 4960, 6.10 said, *if the receiver detects a partial chunk, it MUST drop
the chunk*, we should not send the abort. but if we put this discard to inside
state machine, it will send abort.
so we just drop the partial chunk there, never let this chunk go into the state
machine.
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien....@gmail.com>
---
This is basically reverting a chunk of Daniel's and Vlad's 26b87c788100
("net: sctp: fix remote memory pressure from excessive queueing") .
Isn't it going to re-introduce the initial issue then?
Yes, seems so.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
