On 08/25/15 at 09:50am, Jesse Gross wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Pravin Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com> wrote: > > Moving this device means moving all tunnels backed by this device > > rather than specific tunnel device. Thats why it does not look right > > to move such device. > > I agree it seems weird in general. There were two things that made me wonder: > * It doesn't appear that VXLAN or GRE do this. > * The use case for moving a single tunnel to a different namespace is > to have the device and socket live in different places. I guess > conceptually this could apply to collect_md devices as well. (Maybe to > have harder isolation between inside and outside the tunnel?) > > I'm not really sure what the best answer is but at least we should be > consistent across tunnel types.
I agree with Jesse that consistent behaviour is desirable. If needed, let's change it for all encap types. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
