Hi Christoph,

Please see comments inline.

With the issue addressed you can add

Reviewed-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrze...@samsung.com>

W dniu 25.09.2015 o 15:49, Christoph Hellwig pisze:
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
---
  drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_loopback.c | 32 ++++++++++++--------------------
  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_loopback.c 
b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_loopback.c
index 6e2fe63..d4ef421 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_loopback.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_loopback.c
@@ -413,9 +413,6 @@ static inline struct f_lb_opts *to_f_lb_opts(struct 
config_item *item)
                            func_inst.group);
  }

-CONFIGFS_ATTR_STRUCT(f_lb_opts);
-CONFIGFS_ATTR_OPS(f_lb_opts);
-
  static void lb_attr_release(struct config_item *item)
  {
        struct f_lb_opts *lb_opts = to_f_lb_opts(item);
@@ -425,12 +422,11 @@ static void lb_attr_release(struct config_item *item)

  static struct configfs_item_operations lb_item_ops = {
        .release                = lb_attr_release,
-       .show_attribute         = f_lb_opts_attr_show,
-       .store_attribute        = f_lb_opts_attr_store,
  };

-static ssize_t f_lb_opts_qlen_show(struct f_lb_opts *opts, char *page)
+static ssize_t f_lb_opts_qlen_show(struct config_item *item, char *page)
  {
+       struct f_lb_opts *opts = to_f_lb_opts(item);
        int result;

        mutex_lock(&opts->lock);
@@ -440,9 +436,10 @@ static ssize_t f_lb_opts_qlen_show(struct f_lb_opts *opts, 
char *page)
        return result;
  }

-static ssize_t f_lb_opts_qlen_store(struct f_lb_opts *opts,
+static ssize_t f_lb_opts_qlen_store(struct config_item *item,
                                    const char *page, size_t len)
  {
+       struct f_lb_opts *opts = to_f_lb_opts(item);
        int ret;
        u32 num;

@@ -463,13 +460,9 @@ end:
        return ret;
  }

-static struct f_lb_opts_attribute f_lb_opts_qlen =
-       __CONFIGFS_ATTR(qlen, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
-                       f_lb_opts_qlen_show,
-                       f_lb_opts_qlen_store);
-
In my opinion the below line belongs here:

+CONFIGFS_ATTR(f_lb_opts_, qlen);

-static ssize_t f_lb_opts_bulk_buflen_show(struct f_lb_opts *opts, char *page)
+static ssize_t f_lb_opts_bulk_buflen_show(struct config_item *item, char *page)
  {
+       struct f_lb_opts *opts = to_f_lb_opts(item);
        int result;

        mutex_lock(&opts->lock);
@@ -479,9 +472,10 @@ static ssize_t f_lb_opts_bulk_buflen_show(struct f_lb_opts 
*opts, char *page)
        return result;
  }

-static ssize_t f_lb_opts_bulk_buflen_store(struct f_lb_opts *opts,
+static ssize_t f_lb_opts_bulk_buflen_store(struct config_item *item,
                                    const char *page, size_t len)
  {
+       struct f_lb_opts *opts = to_f_lb_opts(item);
        int ret;
        u32 num;

@@ -502,14 +496,12 @@ end:
        return ret;
  }

-static struct f_lb_opts_attribute f_lb_opts_bulk_buflen =
-       __CONFIGFS_ATTR(buflen, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
-                       f_lb_opts_bulk_buflen_show,
-                       f_lb_opts_bulk_buflen_store);
+CONFIGFS_ATTR(f_lb_opts_, qlen);
+CONFIGFS_ATTR(f_lb_opts_, bulk_buflen);

Why group CONFIGFS_ATTR invocations if in the original code their
corresponding __CONFIGFS_ATTR invocations were where they were?



  static struct configfs_attribute *lb_attrs[] = {
-       &f_lb_opts_qlen.attr,
-       &f_lb_opts_bulk_buflen.attr,
+       &f_lb_opts_attr_qlen,
+       &f_lb_opts_attr_bulk_buflen,
        NULL,
  };



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to