On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 12:15 +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > Also counter question: why is the netstamp code protected by a > static_key otherwise if not for trying to suppress the code path as > often as possible if not used? ;)
Any idea of why timestamping is asked on AF_UNIX in the first place ? For messages sent/received on af_unix sockets, in which place timestamp is taken ? Is it at the time skb is cooked and stored in receive queue, or the time it was dequeued ? In any case, is your patch changing af_unix behavior ? It is not clear from your changelog... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
