Hi Sergei, On Tue, Oct 27, 2015, at 20:01, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > On 10/27/2015 06:02 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > > > CHECKSUM_PARTIAL skbs should never arrive in ip_fragment. If we get one > > of those warn about them once and handle them gracefully by recalculating > > the checksum. > > > > Cc: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> > > Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasev...@gmail.com> > > Cc: Benjamin Coddington <bcodd...@redhat.com> > > Cc: Tom Herbert <t...@herbertland.com> > > Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <han...@stressinduktion.org> > > --- > > net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 8 +++++--- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c > > index 0b02417..3f94a3b 100644 > > --- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c > > +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c > > @@ -533,6 +533,11 @@ int ip_do_fragment(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, > > struct sk_buff *skb, > > > > dev = rt->dst.dev; > > > > + /* for offloaded checksums cleanup checksum before fragmentation */ > > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) && > > + (err = skb_checksum_help(skb))) > > scripts/checkpatch.pl shou;d have complained about using = in the > *if* > expression.
I know and I ignored it deliberately because I found it nicer this way. I made sure gcc does not complain by using extra braces around the assignment. Bye, Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
