On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 20:14 +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 19:58, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> Can you elaborate?
> 
> I use tail as a cookie and check if we already tried to append to the
> same tail skb with skb_append_pagefrags. If during allocation, which we
> do outside of the locks, a new skb arrives, we take that and try to
> append again (and free the old skb), to correctly not create any
> reordering in the data stream.
> 
> You think that tail could be reused in the meanwhile?

Hmmm, there is some funky stuff at least.

Are you sure the __skb_queue_tail(&other->sk_receive_queue, newskb)
is appropriate ?

(Why not locking sk_receive_queue is safe ?)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to