On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 22:53 +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote: > > You don't steer QUIC source addresses at all? I think most networking > failures are of transient nature thus the kernel routing subsystem is > not aware of link quality and packets get lost anyway e.g. in the air? > Thus binding on multiple interfaces and keepalives seem still > appropriate, no?
Imagine you are in your home near a wifi AP, then you close a door and switch to 3G, or another AP. No down time. packet will eventually reach its destination. Application does not have to care. Why QUIC should absolutely use '4-tuple UDP connections' when this is likely to fail in this scenario ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
