On 17.12.2015 16:28, Rainer Weikusat wrote: > Hannes Frederic Sowa <han...@stressinduktion.org> writes: >> On 16.12.2015 21:09, Rainer Weikusat wrote: >>> With b3ca9b02b00704053a38bfe4c31dbbb9c13595d0, the AF_UNIX SOCK_STREAM >>> receive code was changed from using mutex_lock(&u->readlock) to >>> mutex_lock_interruptible(&u->readlock) to prevent signals from being >>> delayed for an indefinite time if a thread sleeping on the mutex >>> happened to be selected for handling the signal. But this was never a >>> problem with the stream receive code (as opposed to its datagram >>> counterpart) as that never went to sleep waiting for new messages with the >>> mutex held and thus, wouldn't cause secondary readers to block on the >>> mutex waiting for the sleeping primary reader. As the interruptible >>> locking makes the code more complicated in exchange for no benefit, >>> change it back to using mutex_lock. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rainer Weikusat <rweiku...@mobileactivedefense.com> >>> --- >>> >>> Considering that the datagram receive routine also doesn't go the sleep >>> with the mutex held anymore, the 37ab4fa7844a044dc21fde45e2a0fc2f3c3b6490 >>> change to unix_autobind is now similarly purposeless. >> >> I wouldn't do this conversion, yet. There is still a deadlock lingering >> around which should be solved earlier: >> >> http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2015/11/10/4 >> >> Unfortunately I haven't found a good way how to solve it, yet. > > Judging from the link, that's not related to the stream receive code. >
No, but to commit 37ab4fa7844a044dc21fde45e2a0fc2f3c3b6490 where the mutexes of unix_bind and unix_autobind got changed. The unix_stream_read_generic conversion is fine. Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <han...@stressinduktion.org> Thanks, Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html