On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:07:08AM +0800, Xin Long wrote: >> >> I'm just wondering, why do not we handle the genuine double rehash >> issue inside rhashtable? i mean it's just a temporary error that a >> simple retry may fix it. > > Because a double rehash means that someone has cracked your hash > function and there is no point in trying anymore.
ok, get your point, is it possible to be triggered by some cases under a big stress insertion, but they are all legal cases. like we use rhash in nftables, if there are a big batch sets to insert, may this issue happen? > > Cheers, > -- > Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> > Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ > PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
