On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:07:20PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:02:30PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > > --- a/net/sctp/proc.c
> > > +++ b/net/sctp/proc.c
> > > @@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file
> > > *seq, void *v)
> > > tsp = (struct sctp_transport *)v;
> > > assoc = tsp->asoc;
> > >
> > > + rcu_read_lock();
>
> should have used rcu_read_lock_bh() here, will send a v2 tomorrow.
Please just drop this one, no change is actually needed.
rhashtable_walk_start() already puts the rcu_read_lock() in there and
disabling bh is not necessary. Thanks.
> > > list_for_each_entry_rcu(tsp, &assoc->peer.transport_addr_list,
> > > transports) {
> > > if (tsp->dead)
> > > @@ -543,6 +544,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file
> > > *seq, void *v)
> > >
> > > seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> > > }
> > > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.5.0
> > >
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
