On 02/02/2016 08:16 PM, Byeoungwook Kim wrote:
rtl_*_delay() functions were reused same codes about addr variable. So i have converted to rtl_addr_delay() from code about addr variable.Signed-off-by: Byeoungwook Kim <quddnr...@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Julian Calaby <julian.cal...@gmail.com> --- V2 split in separate patchs. drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c | 28 ++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c index 05f432c..c1193d1 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/core.c @@ -63,18 +63,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtl_addr_delay); void rtl_rfreg_delay(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum radio_path rfpath, u32 addr, u32 mask, u32 data) { - if (addr == 0xfe) { - mdelay(50); - } else if (addr == 0xfd) { - mdelay(5); - } else if (addr == 0xfc) { - mdelay(1); - } else if (addr == 0xfb) { - udelay(50); - } else if (addr == 0xfa) { - udelay(5); - } else if (addr == 0xf9) { - udelay(1); + if (addr >= 0xf9 && addr <= 0xfe) { + rtl_addr_delay(addr); } else { rtl_set_rfreg(hw, rfpath, addr, mask, data); udelay(1); @@ -84,18 +74,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtl_rfreg_delay); void rtl_bb_delay(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 addr, u32 data) { - if (addr == 0xfe) { - mdelay(50); - } else if (addr == 0xfd) { - mdelay(5); - } else if (addr == 0xfc) { - mdelay(1); - } else if (addr == 0xfb) { - udelay(50); - } else if (addr == 0xfa) { - udelay(5); - } else if (addr == 0xf9) { - udelay(1); + if (addr >= 0xf9 && addr <= 0xfe) { + rtl_addr_delay(addr); } else { rtl_set_bbreg(hw, addr, MASKDWORD, data); udelay(1);
Unlike patch 1 of 2, this one makes changes that are good. Thus Acked-by: Larry Finger <larry.fin...@lwfinger.net> Thanks, Larry
