On 2/2/2016 5:26 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
We added here a patch from Matan and Alaa for addressing Linus comments on
the mess w.r.t reserved field names in the driver/firmware auto-generated file.

Once the patch hits linus tree, we'll ask Doug to rebase his tree on that
rc so both net-next and rdma-next development for 4.6 will be done under
the fixed robust form.

Hi Dave,

We've identified few places in the auto generated file where the naming conversion of reserved fields was not fully applied. Since the patch only did re-naming of reserved fields which are not used for existing functionality, the testing we did
under the modified header file didn't catch that...

We'll respin the patch and series.

Or.

Reply via email to