Hi David,
On jeu., janv. 14 2016, David Laight <david.lai...@aculab.com> wrote:
> From: Gregory CLEMENT
>> Sent: 12 January 2016 19:11
>> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clem...@free-electrons.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c b/drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c
>> index 3d1c0c3880ec..214bb964165b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c
>> @@ -964,7 +964,7 @@ int mvebu_mbus_get_dram_win_info(phys_addr_t phyaddr, u8
>> *target, u8 *attr)
>> for (i = 0; i < dram->num_cs; i++) {
>> const struct mbus_dram_window *cs = dram->cs + i;
>>
>> - if (cs->base <= phyaddr && phyaddr <= (cs->base + cs->size)) {
>> + if (cs->base <= phyaddr && phyaddr <= (cs->base + cs->size -
>> 1)) {
>
> Wouldn't it be better to change the line to:
>> + if (cs->base <= phyaddr && phyaddr < (cs->base +
>cs->size)) {
It doesn't work if there is 4GB of memory in this case we can have
cs->base + cs->size which wrap to 0 and the test fails. It was exactly
what happened on Armada XP GP board.
Gregory
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
