Send Netdot-users mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Netdot-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Netdot 1.0.1-RC1 available for download (Emmanuel Togo)
2. Re: Netdot 1.0.1-RC1 available for download (Phil Regnauld)
3. Re: Netdot 1.0.1-RC1 available for download (Emmanuel Togo)
4. Re: Netdot 1.0.1-RC1 available for download (Carlos Vicente)
5. Re: Netdot 1.0.1-RC1 available for download (Carlos Vicente)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:29:41 +0000
From: Emmanuel Togo <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] Netdot 1.0.1-RC1 available for download
To: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
Cc: "Steven G. Huter" <[email protected]>, netdot-users
<[email protected]>, netdot-devel
<[email protected]>, netdot-announce
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<CABLyZ1s2DRJT7+h2q6O2=yd4pt6ohe82snfs8wojm7_gvta...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi All,
My upgrade was very successful. Thank you Carlos and the rest of the Team
for making this software available to all of us. its AWESOME!!!!
For those who are thinking of upgrading to versoin1.0.1, from my experience
you need to be a lot more patient because it takes time to upgrade the
database. Just to give you an idea it took me roughly 8 hours to complete
my upgrade. it was worth the wait because the new features are making me
love netdot the more.
Don't forget to update your Site.conf file as well.
Cheers
Emmanuel
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Carlos Vicente <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The first release candidate of Netdot 1.0.1 is available for download:
>
> https://osl.uoregon.edu/redmine/projects/netdot/wiki/Download
>
> *THIS IS NOT A PRODUCTION RELEASE*
>
> Version 1.0.1 contains many bug fixes and improvements. The most
> significant changes include:
>
> * Asset tracking for documenting devices and modules independently of
> whether they are installed or not (stock inventory)
> * IPv6 subnet and address discovery. DHCPv6 support
> * Improved use of native database constraints
>
> Please review the full change log here:
>
> https://osl.uoregon.edu/redmine/projects/netdot/wiki/101RC1_ChangeLog
>
> And the user manual here:
>
> https://osl.uoregon.edu/redmine/projects/netdot/files
>
> Please report any bugs via the Redmine interface (e-mail registration
> required):
>
> https://osl.uoregon.edu/redmine/projects/netdot/issues
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> The Netdot Team
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netdot-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://osl.uoregon.edu/pipermail/netdot-users/attachments/20120622/8c2e36df/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:45:53 +0200
From: Phil Regnauld <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] Netdot 1.0.1-RC1 available for download
To: Emmanuel Togo <[email protected]>
Cc: netdot-devel <[email protected]>, "Steven G. Huter"
<[email protected]>, netdot-users <[email protected]>,
netdot-announce <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On 22/06/2012, at 13.29, Emmanuel Togo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just to give you an idea it took me roughly 8 hours to complete my upgrade.
Hi Emmanuel,
Did it take 8 hours to complete only the db upgrade part ?
If so, how many objects/nodes? You are using MySQL I imagine? Would be useful
to know which backend you use and what tuning is done (caches etc)
Also, it's worth considering dropping the indexes before in some cases if every
row needs to be updated. MySQL is particularly bad with this kind I stuff. It'd
be interesting to run a few test upgrades with different parameters to see if
this can be improved/documented.
Thanks for the feedback!
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:36:37 +0000
From: Emmanuel Togo <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] Netdot 1.0.1-RC1 available for download
To: Phil Regnauld <[email protected]>
Cc: netdot-devel <[email protected]>, "Steven G. Huter"
<[email protected]>, netdot-users <[email protected]>,
netdot-announce <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<CABLyZ1tKY=jCbnefTUFh0k1m=oCr60ySOv1R=c3jk6bpgcn...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Phil,
Yes it took 8 hours just for the db upgrade part.
you are right I am using mysql. presently I have 218 devices (not sure
devices=nodes/objects) in the db. before the ugrade the db size was 347M.
regards
Emmanuel
Regards
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Phil Regnauld <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On 22/06/2012, at 13.29, Emmanuel Togo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Just to give you an idea it took me roughly 8 hours to complete my
> upgrade.
>
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> Did it take 8 hours to complete only the db upgrade part ?
>
> If so, how many objects/nodes? You are using MySQL I imagine? Would be
> useful to know which backend you use and what tuning is done (caches etc)
>
> Also, it's worth considering dropping the indexes before in some cases if
> every row needs to be updated. MySQL is particularly bad with this kind I
> stuff. It'd be interesting to run a few test upgrades with different
> parameters to see if this can be improved/documented.
>
> Thanks for the feedback!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://osl.uoregon.edu/pipermail/netdot-users/attachments/20120622/42280207/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:42:36 -0400
From: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] Netdot 1.0.1-RC1 available for download
To: Phil Regnauld <[email protected]>
Cc: netdot-users <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 6/22/12 7:45 AM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> Also, it's worth considering dropping the indexes before in some
> cases if every row needs to be updated. MySQL is particularly bad
> with this kind I stuff. It'd be interesting to run a few test
> upgrades with different parameters to see if this can be
> improved/documented.
Indeed. I've been meaning to try that.
More about this later.
cv
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:03:22 -0400
From: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] Netdot 1.0.1-RC1 available for download
To: Phil Regnauld <[email protected]>
Cc: netdot-users <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 6/22/12 1:42 PM, Carlos Vicente wrote:
> On 6/22/12 7:45 AM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
>> Also, it's worth considering dropping the indexes before in some
>> cases if every row needs to be updated. MySQL is particularly bad
>> with this kind I stuff. It'd be interesting to run a few test
>> upgrades with different parameters to see if this can be
>> improved/documented.
>
>
> Indeed. I've been meaning to try that.
>
Actually, I did look into this before. The 'DISABLE KEYS' feature in
mysql only works with MyISAM tables. Netdot uses InnoDB.
If anyone has suggestions on how to speed up ALTER TABLE, etc. commands
in Mysql, please let me know.
cv
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Netdot-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
End of Netdot-users Digest, Vol 43, Issue 6
*******************************************
