Send Netdot-users mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Netdot-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Allocating strands to devices help (Carlos Vicente)
2. Multiple Community Strings? (John Begley)
3. Re: Multiple Community Strings? (Carlos Vicente)
4. overlapping networks, nat, vlans, and VRFs (Karl Putland)
5. Re: overlapping networks, nat, vlans, and VRFs (Carlos Vicente)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 09:09:26 -0400
From: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] Allocating strands to devices help
To: "Sheppard, Alastair" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Hi Alastair,
I made some changes yesterday that should take care of this problem. The
fixed code is available via git in the netdot-1.0 branch. Or you can
wait for the final 1.0.1 release.
Thank you for your report.
cv
On 7/24/12 6:02 PM, Sheppard, Alastair wrote:
> Morning,
>
>
>
> I?m stuck trying to figure this out on 1.0.1RC3. I have a 12 strand
> fibre I?ve created as a backbone cable between two sites and I?d like to
> document that the strands 1&2 are used to connect two switches?
> interfaces. I can create a site link with the two sites and a circuit
> that has the two interfaces but the ?cable strand sequences? box comes
> up blank (apart from two cables that I spliced together and now can?t
> unassign). Is that meant to have the individual strands that I can
> select for this?
>
>
>
> Cheers Alastair
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> P Please consider the environment before you print this email.
>
>
>
> "The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) may be confidential
> and/or subject to copyright. Any unauthorised use,
> distribution, or copying of the contents is expressly prohibited. If you
> have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender
> by return e-mail or telephone and then delete this e-mail together with all
> attachments from your system."
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netdot-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
>
--
cv
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:46:07 -0400
From: John Begley <[email protected]>
Subject: [Netdot-users] Multiple Community Strings?
To: "[netdot-users]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<cahvcklti7wg_pbgzd7g3seggz5niztl7ua_kmqycm4wnjqf...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I'm sorry to ask for this one, but Cisco in their infinite wisdom has
decided to implement VRFs differently on the Nexus platform, and it
involves being forced to use a different community string for each VRF to
aquire the IP information specific to the VRF. (Not the interfaces
themselves, which all show up on all of the community strings... so
awesome).
snmp-server context management vrf management
snmp-server community public group vdc-operator
snmp-server mib community-map public context management
snmp-server community public1 group vdc-operator
snmp-server context core vrf core
snmp-server mib community-map public1 context core
Is there any way to hit a single device with more than one community string
so we aren't lost documenting the IP information for only 1 VRF?
Again, I apologize.
JB
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://osl.uoregon.edu/pipermail/netdot-users/attachments/20120727/e7b0e447/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:21:36 -0400
From: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] Multiple Community Strings?
To: John Begley <[email protected]>
Cc: "\[netdot-users\]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Ah, lovely.
Two things:
a) A Nexus class for SNMP::Info has yet to be written
b) The Netdot DB needs to change to support multiple communities per device.
cv
On 7/27/12 1:46 PM, John Begley wrote:
> I'm sorry to ask for this one, but Cisco in their infinite wisdom has
> decided to implement VRFs differently on the Nexus platform, and it
> involves being forced to use a different community string for each VRF
> to aquire the IP information specific to the VRF. (Not the interfaces
> themselves, which all show up on all of the community strings... so
> awesome).
>
> snmp-server context management vrf management
> snmp-server community public group vdc-operator
> snmp-server mib community-map public context management
>
> snmp-server community public1 group vdc-operator
> snmp-server context core vrf core
> snmp-server mib community-map public1 context core
>
> Is there any way to hit a single device with more than one community
> string so we aren't lost documenting the IP information for only 1 VRF?
>
> Again, I apologize.
>
> JB
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netdot-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
>
--
cv
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:29:04 -0600
From: Karl Putland <[email protected]>
Subject: [Netdot-users] overlapping networks, nat, vlans, and VRFs
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<ca+exwswvncenwvnaanxotnke+rzmnpgzogl27tec21_voqp...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Has a solution been put in to support overlapping network space?
I noticed bug #531 says for 1.0, but it hasn't been updated in a long time.
Thanks,
--Karl
Karl Putland
Senior VoIP Engineer
*SimpleSignal*
3600 S Yosemite, Suite 150
Denver, CO 80237
One Number Rings All My Phones: 303-242-8608
SimpleSignal.com <http://www.simplesignal.com/> |
Blog<http://www.simplesignal.com/blog>
| Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/SimpleSignal?ref=ts> |
Twitter<http://twitter.com/simplesignal>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://osl.uoregon.edu/pipermail/netdot-users/attachments/20120727/1cb9889a/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:33:07 -0400
From: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] overlapping networks, nat, vlans, and VRFs
To: Karl Putland <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Not yet.
It's definitely important, and in our list, but it'll take some major
code changes.
cv
On 7/27/12 2:29 PM, Karl Putland wrote:
> Has a solution been put in to support overlapping network space?
> I noticed bug #531 says for 1.0, but it hasn't been updated in a long time.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Karl
>
> Karl Putland
> Senior VoIP Engineer
>
> *SimpleSignal*
> 3600 S Yosemite, Suite 150
> Denver, CO 80237
> One Number Rings All My Phones: 303-242-8608
>
> SimpleSignal.com <http://www.simplesignal.com/> | Blog
> <http://www.simplesignal.com/blog> | Facebook
> <http://www.facebook.com/SimpleSignal?ref=ts> | Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/simplesignal>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netdot-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
>
--
cv
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Netdot-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
End of Netdot-users Digest, Vol 44, Issue 17
********************************************
