Send Netdot-users mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Netdot-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: FWT and ARP collection from Cisco ASA (Carlos Vicente)
2. Re: IP hierarchy had to be rebuilt? (Jiann-Ming Su)
3. Re: IP hierarchy had to be rebuilt? (Carlos Vicente)
4. Re: edit owner on container set prefix on all subnets
(Carlos Vicente)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 13:40:18 -0400
From: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] FWT and ARP collection from Cisco ASA
To: "Schroeder, AJ (GE Healthcare, consultant)" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi AJ,
I don't see the error you mentioned in the first e-mail. Is it perhaps
from a different unit?
I do see this ASA returning some ARP entries, but no IPv6 neighbors.
Do you have a "ARP" tab in the device page for this particular device?
If so, does it show any entries?
cv
On 9/5/12 12:18 PM, Schroeder, AJ (GE Healthcare, consultant) wrote:
> Carlos,
>
> Attached is the debug output from the CLI.pm debug output.
>
> Thanks,
>
> AJ Schroeder
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 11:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jiann-Ming Su <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] IP hierarchy had to be rebuilt?
To: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
IIRC, I was editing the Owner attribute on the main 192.168.0.0/16 container,
but the 192.168.12.0/31 sub container had a different owner.? Next thing I
know, I'm getting those messages.? Thanks again for your time.
----- Original Message -----
> From: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
> To: Jiann-Ming Su <[email protected]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2012 11:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] IP hierarchy had to be rebuilt?
>
> Actually, there are several things here:
>
> 1) The error message is misleading. I'm correcting that now.
>
> 2) The error suggests that you have an IP object in your database for
> "192.168.12.3/31". This seems wrong because it's not within bit
> boundaries. The closest /31 would be 192.168.12.2/31.
>
> Netdot does not allow me to enter 192.168.12.3/31 as a block. How did it
> get in there? Manual DB insert?
>
> Thanks for any clarifications,
>
> On 9/5/12 9:22 AM, Carlos Vicente wrote:
>> An inconsistency was found in the tree data structure. Nothing too serious.
>>
>> We are rewriting some of this code, btw.
>>
>>
>> On 9/3/12 3:55 PM, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
>>> What does this error mean, and how do I fix it?
>>>
>>> child >= parent: 192.168.12.3/31 >= 192.168.12.4/32. IP hierarchy
> had to be rebuilt. Go back and try again.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Netdot-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> cv
>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 14:28:53 -0400
From: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] IP hierarchy had to be rebuilt?
To: Jiann-Ming Su <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Was it using the "recursive" option of edit owner?
Another person reported that this was changing prefixes, etc. There's
likely a bug there.
I would try to locate that bogus 192.168.12.3/31 block and either change
its prefix length or delete it.
cv
On 9/5/12 2:07 PM, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
> IIRC, I was editing the Owner attribute on the main 192.168.0.0/16
> container, but the 192.168.12.0/31 sub container had a different
> owner. Next thing I know, I'm getting those messages. Thanks again
> for your time.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]> To: Jiann-Ming Su
>> <[email protected]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2012 11:32 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] IP hierarchy had to be rebuilt?
>>
>> Actually, there are several things here:
>>
>> 1) The error message is misleading. I'm correcting that now.
>>
>> 2) The error suggests that you have an IP object in your database
>> for "192.168.12.3/31". This seems wrong because it's not within
>> bit boundaries. The closest /31 would be 192.168.12.2/31.
>>
>> Netdot does not allow me to enter 192.168.12.3/31 as a block. How
>> did it get in there? Manual DB insert?
>>
>> Thanks for any clarifications,
>>
>> On 9/5/12 9:22 AM, Carlos Vicente wrote:
>>> An inconsistency was found in the tree data structure. Nothing
>>> too serious.
>>>
>>> We are rewriting some of this code, btw.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/3/12 3:55 PM, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
>>>> What does this error mean, and how do I fix it?
>>>>
>>>> child >= parent: 192.168.12.3/31 >= 192.168.12.4/32. IP
>>>> hierarchy
>> had to be rebuilt. Go back and try again.
>>>> _______________________________________________ Netdot-users
>>>> mailing list [email protected]
>>>> https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- cv
>>
>
> _______________________________________________ Netdot-users mailing
> list [email protected]
> https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
>
--
cv
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 14:37:33 -0400
From: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] edit owner on container set prefix on all
subnets
To: Karl Putland <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Thanks. I will look into this.
On 8/31/12 3:21 PM, Karl Putland wrote:
> Edit owner with recursive on a container cause damage to all contained
> subnets and IP Addresses.
> Changed prefix and changed some IPs to subnet.
>
> --Karl
>
> Karl Putland
> Senior VoIP Engineer
>
> *SimpleSignal*
> 3600 S Yosemite, Suite 150
> Denver, CO 80237
> One Number Rings All My Phones: 303-242-8608
>
> SimpleSignal.com <http://www.simplesignal.com/> | Blog
> <http://www.simplesignal.com/blog> | Facebook
> <http://www.facebook.com/SimpleSignal?ref=ts> | Twitter
> <http://twitter.com/simplesignal>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netdot-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
>
--
cv
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Netdot-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
End of Netdot-users Digest, Vol 46, Issue 5
*******************************************
