Send Netdot-users mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Netdot-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. moving from 0.9 to 1.0.4 (JoeSox)
2. Re: moving from 0.9 to 1.0.4 (Phil Regnauld)
3. Re: moving from 0.9 to 1.0.4 (JoeSox)
4. Network Topology Graph only displays localhost (JoeSox)
5. Re: Network Topology Graph only displays localhost
(Carlos Vicente)
6. Re: Network Topology Graph only displays localhost (JoeSox)
7. Re: Network Topology Graph only displays localhost
(Carlos Vicente)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 07:47:18 -0700
From: JoeSox <[email protected]>
Subject: [Netdot-users] moving from 0.9 to 1.0.4
To: netdot-users <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<CAAXNyuCQtG-n_8HSvEMo5o+98ZfbNe5=0zzum3pduam9fsx...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I have two separate virtual NETDOT machines and I want to move the
database over to the latest.
Can I just paste the mysqldump to the "Direct SQL Commands " feature?
It looks like it would drop the tables before rebuilding them so I
think I already know the answer but how do I go about getting the
information into the new Netdot server?
--
Thanks Joe
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 17:18:05 +0200
From: Phil Regnauld <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] moving from 0.9 to 1.0.4
To: JoeSox <[email protected]>
Cc: netdot-users <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
JoeSox (joesox) writes:
> I have two separate virtual NETDOT machines and I want to move the
> database over to the latest.
> Can I just paste the mysqldump to the "Direct SQL Commands " feature?
> It looks like it would drop the tables before rebuilding them so I
> think I already know the answer but how do I go about getting the
> information into the new Netdot server?
If you want to migrate the database, it's best to proceed using
mysqldump from the 0.9.x installation, load that into the database
on the 1.0.4 machine, and run the database upgrade process.
Cheers,
Phil
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 09:00:54 -0700
From: JoeSox <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] moving from 0.9 to 1.0.4
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<caaxnyud4kacaqflqmj3ammoeowgjctjtnyusn1hjwzx2nim...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Phil,
I will check out the upgrade doc to see what is involved (assuming the
database upgrade process details are in there).
--
Thanks, Joe
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Phil Regnauld <[email protected]> wrote:
> JoeSox (joesox) writes:
>> I have two separate virtual NETDOT machines and I want to move the
>> database over to the latest.
>> Can I just paste the mysqldump to the "Direct SQL Commands " feature?
>> It looks like it would drop the tables before rebuilding them so I
>> think I already know the answer but how do I go about getting the
>> information into the new Netdot server?
>
> If you want to migrate the database, it's best to proceed using
> mysqldump from the 0.9.x installation, load that into the database
> on the 1.0.4 machine, and run the database upgrade process.
>
> Cheers,
> Phil
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 10:44:56 -0700
From: JoeSox <[email protected]>
Subject: [Netdot-users] Network Topology Graph only displays localhost
To: netdot-users <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<CAAXNyuDRQhJFvnmV+ybwtfFJ25jzxNvfQVn=NspXjMq=ocp...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
For NETDOT 1.0.4, when I Regenerate Network Graph without VLANs and
Network Graph with VLANs it only displays "localhost"
I have 17 devices all connected together, what am I missing?
In v0.9 it used to generate the entire topology.
--
Thanks, Joe
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 13:52:52 -0400
From: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] Network Topology Graph only displays
localhost
To: JoeSox <[email protected]>
Cc: netdot-users <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi Joe,
I assume that "localhost" is a device in your DB.
When you go to the Interfaces tab for that device, do you see anything
in the "neighbors" column?
The device listed as "NMS_DEVICE" in your config file is the start of
the topology graph, and it must be connected to the rest of the network.
cv
On 5/30/13 1:44 PM, JoeSox wrote:
> For NETDOT 1.0.4, when I Regenerate Network Graph without VLANs and
> Network Graph with VLANs it only displays "localhost"
> I have 17 devices all connected together, what am I missing?
> In v0.9 it used to generate the entire topology.
> --
> Thanks, Joe
> _______________________________________________
> Netdot-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 11:00:58 -0700
From: JoeSox <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] Network Topology Graph only displays
localhost
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<caaxnyudgxwbe728xnx93juamavdyp5y3nclwjv0qej8y0zz...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Carlos,
'localhost' is NETDOT VM image I downloaded (Linux netdot
3.2.0-34-virtual #53-Ubuntu) that is the server.
ok, sounds like I need to update 'NMS_DEVICE' to the fake MPLS cloud
device I created.
Where is the location of the "config" file in the 1.0.4 vm image?
--
Later, JoeSox
() ascii ribbon campaign against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Carlos Vicente <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> I assume that "localhost" is a device in your DB.
>
> When you go to the Interfaces tab for that device, do you see anything
> in the "neighbors" column?
>
> The device listed as "NMS_DEVICE" in your config file is the start of
> the topology graph, and it must be connected to the rest of the network.
>
> cv
>
> On 5/30/13 1:44 PM, JoeSox wrote:
>> For NETDOT 1.0.4, when I Regenerate Network Graph without VLANs and
>> Network Graph with VLANs it only displays "localhost"
>> I have 17 devices all connected together, what am I missing?
>> In v0.9 it used to generate the entire topology.
>> --
>> Thanks, Joe
>> _______________________________________________
>> Netdot-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 14:15:42 -0400
From: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] Network Topology Graph only displays
localhost
To: JoeSox <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
/usr/local/netdot/etc/Site.conf
cv
On 5/30/13 2:00 PM, JoeSox wrote:
> Carlos,
> 'localhost' is NETDOT VM image I downloaded (Linux netdot
> 3.2.0-34-virtual #53-Ubuntu) that is the server.
>
> ok, sounds like I need to update 'NMS_DEVICE' to the fake MPLS cloud
> device I created.
> Where is the location of the "config" file in the 1.0.4 vm image?
> --
> Later, JoeSox
> () ascii ribbon campaign against html e-mail
> /\ www.asciiribbon.org
>
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> I assume that "localhost" is a device in your DB.
>>
>> When you go to the Interfaces tab for that device, do you see anything
>> in the "neighbors" column?
>>
>> The device listed as "NMS_DEVICE" in your config file is the start of
>> the topology graph, and it must be connected to the rest of the network.
>>
>> cv
>>
>> On 5/30/13 1:44 PM, JoeSox wrote:
>>> For NETDOT 1.0.4, when I Regenerate Network Graph without VLANs and
>>> Network Graph with VLANs it only displays "localhost"
>>> I have 17 devices all connected together, what am I missing?
>>> In v0.9 it used to generate the entire topology.
>>> --
>>> Thanks, Joe
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Netdot-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
> _______________________________________________
> Netdot-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Netdot-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
End of Netdot-users Digest, Vol 54, Issue 7
*******************************************
