Send Netdot-users mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Netdot-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Ipblock status update (????? ?)
2. Re: Ipblock status update (Carlos Vicente)
3. Re: Ipblock status update (Carlos Vicente)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 11:06:06 +0300
From: ????? ? <[email protected]>
Subject: [Netdot-users] Ipblock status update
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<CANifKqsb1j1QXOPfWyhp=7m0op8hmsfj+hchgf96zvevzp8...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I have the qestion about ip block stsus.
The documentation shows that the *discovered *is the "Addresses that have
not been assigned as static or dynamic, but have been seen on the network
(as part of ARP entries, for example)."
When I browse "Subnet Block View" of one of my subnets I can see some
discovered, static and reserved addresses. All other addresses in that
subnet are marked as *available*.
But if I open current ARP table I can see much more addresses. Why, then,
in the subnet view they are marked as available, and not discovered?
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://osl.uoregon.edu/pipermail/netdot-users/attachments/20150401/b0e723a2/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:31:44 -0400
From: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] Ipblock status update
To: ????? ? <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hi,
What DB are you using? Pg?
I?m looking at the code and it would seem that it does the right thing for
MySQL, but not for Pg.
cv
On Apr 1, 2015, at 4:06 AM, ????? ? <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have the qestion about ip block stsus.
>
> The documentation shows that the discovered is the "Addresses that have not
> been assigned as static or dynamic, but have been seen on the network (as
> part of ARP entries, for example)."
>
> When I browse "Subnet Block View" of one of my subnets I can see some
> discovered, static and reserved addresses. All other addresses in that subnet
> are marked as available.
> But if I open current ARP table I can see much more addresses. Why, then, in
> the subnet view they are marked as available, and not discovered?
>
> Thank you
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netdot-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:46:53 -0400
From: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] Ipblock status update
To: ????? ? <[email protected]>
Cc: Netdot-users <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hmm, strange.
The main implication is that a ?discovered? address should not be automatically
assigned when requesting a new ?Static? IP for a DNS record. On the other hand,
?Available? addresses would.
?Discovered? addresses should be considered an anomaly. It means that someone
is using an address that was not allocated/documented.
The TTL variable you mention is not related.
I have created ticket https://osl.uoregon.edu/redmine/issues/1854 to look into
this issue. At the very least, the Pg case needs to be fixed.
cv
On Apr 1, 2015, at 10:40 AM, ????? ? <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
> Thanks for reply.
> We are using MySQL 5.6.10. Netdot 1.0.6.
> What is the logic of the changes from "discovered" to "available" and vice
> versa?
> I've found some option - IP_TREE_TTL. Default value is 86400. Can it cause?
>
> Thank you
>
> 2015-04-01 17:31 GMT+03:00 Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>:
> Hi,
>
> What DB are you using? Pg?
>
> I?m looking at the code and it would seem that it does the right thing for
> MySQL, but not for Pg.
>
>
> cv
>
> On Apr 1, 2015, at 4:06 AM, ????? ? <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I have the qestion about ip block stsus.
> >
> > The documentation shows that the discovered is the "Addresses that have not
> > been assigned as static or dynamic, but have been seen on the network (as
> > part of ARP entries, for example)."
> >
> > When I browse "Subnet Block View" of one of my subnets I can see some
> > discovered, static and reserved addresses. All other addresses in that
> > subnet are marked as available.
> > But if I open current ARP table I can see much more addresses. Why, then,
> > in the subnet view they are marked as available, and not discovered?
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Netdot-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
>
>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Netdot-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
End of Netdot-users Digest, Vol 77, Issue 1
*******************************************
