Send Netdot-users mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Netdot-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CDP LLDP Discovery (Chip Pleasants)
2. Re: CDP LLDP Discovery (Carlos Vicente)
3. Re: CDP LLDP Discovery (Chip Pleasants)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:09:24 -0400
From: Chip Pleasants <[email protected]>
Subject: [Netdot-users] CDP LLDP Discovery
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<cajq5atqpa_wfs1asnur4rpswdukunsu8wpset3evqf+lhpn...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi all,
Could someone tell me how'd I'd make sure CDP and LLDP discovery are
disabled? I see the following entries in the Site.conf. Would the log show
is discovering via CDP and LLDP too?
-Chip
# Use Discovery Protocols (CDP, LLDP)
TOPO_USE_DP => 0,
TOPO_WEIGHT_DP => 8,
# Enable this if you want unknown devices found by discovery protocols
# (CDP/LLDP) to be added to the database when discovering topology
ADD_UNKNOWN_DP_DEVS => 1,
# When unknown devices are found by discovery protocols (CDP/LLDP),
# do not try to add them to the database if their IP addresses
# are within these blocks. The values on the right are not
# actually relevant.
#EXCLUDE_UNKNOWN_DP_DEVS_FROM_BLOCKS => {
# '10.0.0.0/8' => 'rfc-1918',
#},
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://osl.uoregon.edu/pipermail/netdot-users/attachments/20150924/33526bcd/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:37:53 -0400
From: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] CDP LLDP Discovery
To: Chip Pleasants <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi Chip,
Setting ADD_UNKNOWN_DP_DEVS to zero will tell Netdot not to add devices to its
database when those are found in the CDP/LLDP neighbor tables of existing
devices.
The logs do show when it tries to add new neighbors like that.
cv
On Sep 24, 2015, at 5:09 PM, Chip Pleasants <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Could someone tell me how'd I'd make sure CDP and LLDP discovery are
> disabled? I see the following entries in the Site.conf. Would the log show
> is discovering via CDP and LLDP too?
>
> -Chip
>
>
>
> # Use Discovery Protocols (CDP, LLDP)
> TOPO_USE_DP => 0,
> TOPO_WEIGHT_DP => 8,
>
>
> # Enable this if you want unknown devices found by discovery protocols
> # (CDP/LLDP) to be added to the database when discovering topology
> ADD_UNKNOWN_DP_DEVS => 1,
>
> # When unknown devices are found by discovery protocols (CDP/LLDP),
> # do not try to add them to the database if their IP addresses
> # are within these blocks. The values on the right are not
> # actually relevant.
> #EXCLUDE_UNKNOWN_DP_DEVS_FROM_BLOCKS => {
> # '10.0.0.0/8' => 'rfc-1918',
> #},
> _______________________________________________
> Netdot-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:59:00 -0400
From: Chip Pleasants <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] CDP LLDP Discovery
To: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<cajq5ato_uyoujo_k5mctnhiashwi++hd2uajfbb2rjrqpbj...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Thanks Carlos! Is there a default Site.conf I look at for a comparison?
Looks like it's /etc/Default.conf in the source. Can you confirm CDP/LLDP
is taken via snmp polling?
-Chip
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hi Chip,
>
> Setting ADD_UNKNOWN_DP_DEVS to zero will tell Netdot not to add devices to
> its database when those are found in the CDP/LLDP neighbor tables of
> existing devices.
>
> The logs do show when it tries to add new neighbors like that.
>
> cv
>
> On Sep 24, 2015, at 5:09 PM, Chip Pleasants <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Could someone tell me how'd I'd make sure CDP and LLDP discovery are
> disabled? I see the following entries in the Site.conf. Would the log show
> is discovering via CDP and LLDP too?
> >
> > -Chip
> >
> >
> >
> > # Use Discovery Protocols (CDP, LLDP)
> > TOPO_USE_DP => 0,
> > TOPO_WEIGHT_DP => 8,
> >
> >
> > # Enable this if you want unknown devices found by discovery protocols
> > # (CDP/LLDP) to be added to the database when discovering topology
> > ADD_UNKNOWN_DP_DEVS => 1,
> >
> > # When unknown devices are found by discovery protocols (CDP/LLDP),
> > # do not try to add them to the database if their IP addresses
> > # are within these blocks. The values on the right are not
> > # actually relevant.
> > #EXCLUDE_UNKNOWN_DP_DEVS_FROM_BLOCKS => {
> > # '10.0.0.0/8' => 'rfc-1918',
> > #},
> > _______________________________________________
> > Netdot-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://osl.uoregon.edu/pipermail/netdot-users/attachments/20150925/6761dbac/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Netdot-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
End of Netdot-users Digest, Vol 81, Issue 2
*******************************************
