> Looks like ND4 users like me will have to live with the stored procedure way
> of getting around (as suggested by Brendan) until we move to ND5.
That's unfortunate. I find it hard to believe something so basic was not
supported until ND5. What were they thinking?
> Ryan Gustafson wrote:
[snip]
> In my
> tests it returns -1 if no rows are affected,
Turns out this is wrong, it returns 0 if no rows were affected. I'd swear it
was -1 before, musta been too much Coke.
Later,
Ryan
_________________________________________________________________________
For help in using, subscribing, and unsubscribing to the discussion
forums, please go to: http://www.netdynamics.com/support/visitdevfor.html
For dire need help, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
