Very cool - If any testing is needed, I'd be happy to help out.On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 04:37, Gozem wrote: > 2002-02-28 00:33:26-0500, Matthew Keller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> > > > > I've been playing withe the "latest" ippool and associated modules. It > > seems a little backwards to me. I would think that one could create an > > empty pool (much like one creates an empty chain) and then populate it > > with ippool -A commands (much like one populates iptables the same way). > > Instead it seems that it wants a fixed-range pool defined, and only > > allows you to add and delete from that range. (I understand this is a > > limitation of the "bitmap proof-of-concept"). > > I've been through the archives and there was a flurry of activity on > > this topic at the end of March of 2001, with a lot of forward-thinking > > and good ideas. Wondering if anyone was working on any of that? If not, > > I'd like to take a stab at some of it (namely the ability to maintain > > dynamic lists like chains). I'm probably a horrible C programmer these > > days, as I've been engulfed in Perl for the last few years but I used to > > be decent at it, and as this is something I really really would like to > > see efficiently working, I'd be willing to dump some time at the > > problem. I've checked out the CVS code, and it looks straight forward > > enough. If anyone has any uncommitted code they'd like to share or > > commit to CVS that'd be helpful. > > > > It's already completly rewritten to support more pooltypes and being more > modulized. Its finished and on testing right now as of 2 weeks back. Expect > a large patch to be sent in soon. > > -- > /Gozem A.K.A. Joakim Axelsson > -- Matthew Keller Enterprise System Analyst Computing & Technology Services Information Services Division State University of NY at Potsdam Potsdam, NY USA http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/
