On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 07:44:43PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > Maybe you could avoid these mistakes by using Bitkeeper, > just a suggestion :-)
Well, as you might conclude from my domain name, I have some 'philosophical issues' related to proprietary software. I'll have a look at it, but I'm not sure the reasons for using it are sufficient to convince me. > Actually, back in my CVS days I never send patches out made from a > tree unless I've just done a "cvs -q -z9 update -d ." on that tree and > verified I had no pending crap in it. Well, we have all our patches in CVS (not a kernel source treee). The system is called patch-o-matic and even allows you to patch a 2.4.1 kernel to an up-to-date netfilter subsystem. And I've missed to commit the latest version of the patch to CVS... -- Live long and prosper - Harald Welte / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ GCS/E/IT d- s-: a-- C+++ UL++++$ P+++ L++++$ E--- W- N++ o? K- w--- O- M+ V-- PS++ PE-- Y++ PGP++ t+ 5-- !X !R tv-- b+++ !DI !D G+ e* h--- r++ y+(*)
