On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 04:25:07PM +0100, Gwenael Letellier wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question about how Netfilter DNAT handles TTL. From a previous > experience, I believed NetFilter would not decrement TTLs when routing > DNATed packets.
This sentence already explains why we do it: We are routing a packet, and the TTL has to be decremented on every router. NAT on a bridge would not need to decrement TTL > Thank you, > G. Letellier -- Live long and prosper - Harald Welte / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ GCS/E/IT d- s-: a-- C+++ UL++++$ P+++ L++++$ E--- W- N++ o? K- w--- O- M+ V-- PS++ PE-- Y++ PGP++ t+ 5-- !X !R tv-- b+++ !DI !D G+ e* h--- r++ y+(*)
